If you are not redirected automatically, follow this link to the Badre Lab Website. The Badre Lab


How do we select appropriate actions to reach a desired goal?

How do we implement control to retrieve information from memory?

Cognitive control involves choosing from among a set of actions or representations in order to achieve a certain goal or outcome. We use cognitive control to carry out a variety of tasks, from making a cup of coffee to remembering where the house keys are. The frontal lobes broadly support cognitive control; regions within the frontal lobe guide action selection, so that we add the coffee grounds before turning on the coffee maker. Regions within the frontal lobe also guide memory retrieval, so that we can still search for our keys even when limited external cues are available.

Our lab is interested in how the organization of the frontal lobe influences goal directed behavior, as well as dissociations and interactions between the frontal and medial temporal lobe regions in their contribution to memory function. In our research, we use a variety of methods to investigate these questions, including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as well as behavioral testing of healthy adults and patient populations.

The Badre lab research is supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, The National Institute of Health and Brown University.

Current Projects

Neural Dynamics of Working Memory Gating


Working memory is a capacity-limited system that enables us to store information over a short period of time, and then later use that information to accomplish our behavioral goals. Because the working memory system is severely limited in storage space, it relies on gating mechanisms. Gating mechanisms control which information enters working memory (input gating), and control what information is selected from within working memory to guide behavior (output gating). When we try to remember someone’s phone number, for example, input gating enables this information to be updated into working memory. Then, when it is time to call that person, output gating selects the information being held in working memory, i.e., each number in the right order, so that we call the right person. The goal of this project is to characterize how information carried in working memory transforms during input gating and output gating. Through a combination of behavior, fMRI, and multivariate techniques, we are able to isolate input and output gating processes and estimate the fidelity of information during each respective gating process.
Project Lead: Emily Levin

Adaptive Retrieval During Decision-making


How would you judge the combination of pickles and peanut butter on a bagel? If you have experience with North American cuisine, you likely know the flavor profiles of each ingredient, and could infer how this item might taste. However, in the less likely case that you had previously combined these ingredients in a desperate gamble at lunch, you might have a more detailed representation of this unique experience. As this example illustrates, value judgment frequently depends on an ability to retrieve relevant information from different memory stores: episodic details about specific past experiences, or schema-level memory structures such as knowledge about sandwiches. The aim of this project is to examine the neural processes involved in retrieving information stored in memory systems to support value-based decision-making. We are using computational modeling of behavior and fMRI to examine how subjects make choices based on schematic knowledge about real world items (like food ingredients), and the neural systems involved in retrieving this information, and assessing its value in relation to current goals.
Project Lead: Avinash Vaidya

Investigating how clustering and separation of memories enables behavioral flexibility


We live in a rapidly changing world that requires us to constantly adapt our ways of thinking and approaches to solving problems. While some changes in the world only require minor tweaks to our existing strategies, other changes represent major break points that necessitate radically new approaches. Moreover, adapting to a new situation sometimes means drawing parallels between the current problem and a previous problem we already know how to solve, while other times, older approaches can actually hinder us from discovering the solution. How do we form representations that are general enough to apply to various dissimilar situations, yet flexible enough to be useful? In this project, we investigate how the degree of change and novelty in a task people are performing influences whether they represent the task as a modification of a previous task, as opposed to a new one they've never seen before. We then test how this encoding of the task impacts their ability to learn similar tasks in the future, as well as their ability to relearn a task they've performed previously.
Project Lead:Olga Lositsky

Exception-handling in the learning and generalization of rules


The flexibility of human behavior relies on our ability to deploy a variety of previously learnt, abstract rules in novel situations. However, rules often fit a novel situation imperfectly. Our ability to deal with exceptions to rules, therefore, is crucial, both for maintaining abstract rules, and enabling their use in different tasks. In this study, we examine exception learning strategies and how they impact rule learning. Behavioral experiments provide evidence for a dissociation between rule learning and exception learning, suggesting separate mechanisms. Moreover, different subjects are able to deploy different task rules to the same task by leveraging their ability to separately learn about exceptions. Further experiments will examine how exceptions impact rule learning and generalization.
Project Lead: Apoorva Bhandari

Hierarchical Control of Task Sequences


Frontal neocortex is thought to support our highest intellectual abilities, including our ability to plan and enact a sequence of tasks toward a desired goal. In everyday life, such task sequences are abstract in that they do not require consistent movement sequences and are often assembled “on the fly”. Yet, remarkably little is known about the necessity of frontal sub-regions for such control. We asked participants to repeat short, simple sequences of four simple tasks during fMRI scanning. We have found that rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) activation ramped over position in the sequence, and reset at the initiation of each new sequence. To establish the necessity of RLPFC in this task and specify its functional role, a second group of participants performed the sequential task while undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the RLPFC or a control region. RLPFC stimulation increasingly disrupted task performance as each sequence progressed. These data establish RLPFC as necessary for uncertainty resolution during sequence-level control. Ongoing studies are currently investigating the specific role of uncertainty in the performance of sequential tasks and how sequences of tasks are learned.
Project Lead: Theresa Desrochers

Learning the dynamic structure of a task


Learning how to perform a typical cognitive task often involves figuring out its 'rules' - how stimuli and actions are related to outcomes. The mechanisms underlying this process are well studied. But, learning a task also involves adapting internal cognitive processes to the task's 'dynamic structure' - i.e. the specific timing and order of events relevant to the task. This study investigates this latter process and how it interacts with rule learning. In behavioral experiments, we find evidence that subjects learn a task's dynamic structure in the initial trials, and they transfer this knowledge between tasks. Subjects showed both positive (same task structure) and negative (different task structure) transfer, independent of the rules of the task. fMRI experiments in the pipeline will investigate the neurobiological mechanisms underlying this process.
Project Lead: Apoorva Bhandari

The Cost of Cognitive Effort


Would you rather perform a long series of multiplications by hand or using a calculator? Despite individual differences, people often choose the latter when given the option, even if they are equally capable of performing both tasks. 'Demand avoidance' is argued to stem from the disutility of cognitive effort, the cost of which is integrated into the benefit of performing a task. In order to determine the nature of this cost, we aim to specify the cost function for cognitive effort and explore its origins in the brain. Preliminary behavioral findings showed that the subjective value of a task decreases with increasing cognitive effort. Reward processing areas of the brain, such as ACC and striatum might be tracking this cost associated with mental labor.
Project Lead: Ceyda Sayali